" Cricket Etcetera was voted as the Best Cricket Blog by Google during the World Cup 2007 "

Monday, January 29, 2007

Jacob Oram & Newzealand: Poor end-cricket or God's victims?

Why does it always happen to the weak and the meek?

Why do the underdogs lose most of the close matches? Isn’t it enough that they lose almost all the other matches. What was God doing yesterday when Jacob Oram was shining brilliantly at Perth? BusyJacob Oram, Newzealand Cricketer trying to dampen the spirits with some unneeded rain!! If the almighty had stepped in for the underdog, even if for a measly few minutes, Newzealand could have finally turned the tide. They had done everything else chasing Australia’s mammoth 344 and they deserved to win. Just that they needed a bit of God, and he was unfortunately missing from action.

Oram’s chase reminded me of a similar performance by Sachin Tendulkar against Pakistan in an unofficial 20 over match just before his debut. Both began with the odds stacked heavily against them but with some absolute breathtaking batting they brought their teams within smelling distance of a victory. But just when they needed a bit of outside support, it was not to be and both ended up losing.
(what I call outside support or God is what the expert cricket commentators refer to in a more scientific way as the rub of the green!)

And it’s not about just two instances - scratch your memory cells and try to remember some closely fought matches and you will know what I mean. Of the two matches between India and Australia that were decided by the thinnest margin of a solitary run, the laws of mathematical probability would say that both teams should have won one each. Unfortunately, both were won by Australia. Remember the famous tied test at Chennai? The test could have been won by India, but an Indian umpire erred in favour of the Australians.

Yesterday at the WACA, Jacob Oram smashed six sixes to complete a 71 ball hundred, the fastest ever by a Kiwi batsman. For around 10 overs, they were chasing an impossible asking rate of over 10 and they had almost pulled off the improbable. God had two ways of helping the weaker team – Hayden could have been not dropped on 0 or the almighty could have stepped in towards the end. He failed twice yesterday, and that was bad enough.

Don't miss a most interesting Cricket Quiz posted tomorrow(!!) on The Cricket Quiz


Homer said...


Could it just be that the "stronger" team did the little things right and these added up to the difference between victory and defeat?

Admitted that the rain interruption halted the kiwi momentum going into the final stretch, but Jacob Oram has admitted today that victory was furthest from his mind while chasing down the target.

At the end of the day, running hard for that extra run, diving headlong to save a couple of runs, making that extra effort to take a blinder.. all of these things add up.

man to man, the Aussies are not more talented than any other team in the world.. in the talent stakes alone, the sub continental teams are head and shoulders above the Aussies..

But what sets the aussies apart is the willingness to do the little things, quite unlike the subcontinentals who like to do things extravagantly. ( except for the current Lankans, who are willing to do the hard yards, and are the team to look out for in the WC).

Homer said...

btw, i am looking forward to the next edition of the quiz :)

Darin said...

thank's for the link Bajaj..
just nice to exchange link with you


omar said...

heh - that's an interesting interpretation!

Cricpro said...


I like your blog very much, I like to link my blog with yours,if you agree than link my blog to yours and i'll be linking your's to mine.

My blog is about Cricketers profiles...


If you agrre than, just post a comment on my blog..

looking for your reply..